(Based on a presentation to shareholders of a European-based international industrial enterprise, spring 1999.)
I am a management consultant specializing in workplace ethics, what the Americans like to call ‘business ethics’. People often want to hear more about my work -- isn’t ‘business ethics’ an oxymoron?
What I actually do is to help management and employees recognize moral
dilemmas in decision-making, and provide ways for these to be discussed
and resolved. I also try to strengthen common understanding of ethical
norms that apply to modern corporate life. My brand of organizational
ethics actually deals much more with creating and maintaining a healthy
corporate culture than with exploring philosophical ethics applied to business.
How the code is developed (how much real employee input?), and why the code is developed (just to protect senior management?) is as important as the content of the code itself. The focus of a code is also crucial -- whether it points the way for employees to do business with integrity or just sets out some prohibitions (thus assuming the employees are potential crooks).
Codes cover many subjects -- each organization needs some but not others
at any given time in its history. Remember all the fuss about quality
control, which is now assumed to be a minimum requirement?
Training programs are of various sorts: integrated with other training or separate, self-study or group work. A famous American training program includes a game that brings large numbers of engineers and other professionals together to solve ethical dilemmas that reflect common workplace situations.
Another piece of most ethics programs is an ethics advisory service, to give employees impartial, confidential help. The advice might come on a hot-line from the corporate ombudsman, or from an ethics counsellor or commissioner. Generally it should not come from the company lawyer or staff relations officer.
An ethics program expands the effect of a code, but the question remains,
is the code really just warm words? There is no definitive answer.
With constant attention to ethical decision-making, ethics programs can
act as preventive medicine, to avoid crises, and to help resolve
crises when they occur. However, you cannot create an ethics program
in the middle of a crisis in order to solve the problem -- no one would
accept your good faith without further proof.
So we asked all staff to contribute values and ethics dilemmas in their work. We received many, on a range of subjects: hiring fairly, dealing with political pressure, questionable accounting, personal safety, conflicting policies, and so on. The most representative were sent out again as generic cases (without naming names), and employees met in groups to develop responses.
When the many answers were compiled, it was found that the organization
still had its fundamental values. Furthermore, it is much more acceptable
now to bring an ethical dilemma to one’s colleagues in the organization.
The year-long project has evidently helped to raise morale and reinforce
values without a code or ethics program.
A major benefit of such activities is that it becomes much easier
for employees to overcome their reluctance to discuss ethics in public
and to talk about troubling workplace issues with their colleagues.
Such discussion is the proper way to resolve problems in a large organization,
so that the solutions will benefit from group thinking and also be useful
in future cases. Teamwork and good communications -- sounds familiar.
(My short article on Discovering Discourse Ethics
expands on this approach.)
My conclusion? Business ethics is not an oxymoron. In fact, good ethics is good business.
Please do not reproduce without permission.
Codes of Conduct: Panacea or Bunk? | Discovering
Discourse Ethics | Benefits of Case Discussions
| Interpreting Your Code | Index
of articles
BACK TO WORKPLACE ETHICS CONSULTANCY HOME PAGE
Go back to the Cornelius von Baeyer page.
Go back to some ethics-related Web sites.
This page updated 13 May 99.